cumberbumss:

stfufauxminists:

pansymandy:

This practically made me cry. How could this ever be okay?

[Image: An illustration is labeled as a “partial birth abortion”. It shows a person performing an intact dilation and extraction, which is described at the bottom of the image: “The surgeon pulls the fetus into the breech position. He forced scissors into the skull, removes them and inserts a suction catheter through which he suctions out the skull contents.”]
I’m going to tell you a story that my tenth grade biology teacher told me. 
So, my teacher had a friend. She was happily married, a Christian, and pregnant. She and her husband were extremely excited about the pregnancy and they couldn’t wait to be parents. She was pretty far along - probably about 7 month in. She went to get a check-up, and her doctor checked out the fetus. Well, it turns out her fetus had hydrochephalus. In this particular case, the fetus’s head had not and would not form enough to even hold the brain inside the skull. If the woman continued the pregnancy, she would give birth to a dead baby, and that’s if it didn’t die in utero and possibly cause sepsis before she had the opportunity to give birth.
So, and this was before the “partial birth abortion ban” was enacted (not when the story was told, but when it took place), the woman opted to get an intact dilation and extraction procedure (since that’s the proper medical term, “partial birth abortion” is a made up term and has no medical relevance). 
Do you know what that allowed her to do? What that allows a lot of uterus-bearers in the same predicament to do? 
She was able to hold her dead, intact fetus and mourn for it.
Now, she would have to get a procedure that literally rips the fetus apart, since apparently anti-choicers looking for a means to chip away at Roe v Wade think that this is a better alternative to the described procedure above. As the law currently stands, it is now impossible for people like the woman I described to have their fetuses aborted intact so that they can hold them like they wanted to. It is impossible for women like the one I described to have a body to mourn over. 
So good job. Because you’re too ignorant to actually know why uterus-bearers get late-term abortion, specifically intact D & X procedures, you’ve essentially made it much harder for those that are experiencing the difficult choice to end a wanted pregnancy to mourn and move on. 
But hey, go ahead and continue to consider yourself compassionate. I guess ignorance really is bliss, especially when you can hold up illustrations of medical procedures you don’t understand and hide behind them as if they have any meaning in the face of the reality that you refuse to acknowledge.

^^^ THIS. BLESS YOU.

cumberbumss:

stfufauxminists:

pansymandy:

This practically made me cry. How could this ever be okay?

[Image: An illustration is labeled as a “partial birth abortion”. It shows a person performing an intact dilation and extraction, which is described at the bottom of the image: “The surgeon pulls the fetus into the breech position. He forced scissors into the skull, removes them and inserts a suction catheter through which he suctions out the skull contents.”]

I’m going to tell you a story that my tenth grade biology teacher told me. 

So, my teacher had a friend. She was happily married, a Christian, and pregnant. She and her husband were extremely excited about the pregnancy and they couldn’t wait to be parents. She was pretty far along - probably about 7 month in. She went to get a check-up, and her doctor checked out the fetus. Well, it turns out her fetus had hydrochephalus. In this particular case, the fetus’s head had not and would not form enough to even hold the brain inside the skull. If the woman continued the pregnancy, she would give birth to a dead baby, and that’s if it didn’t die in utero and possibly cause sepsis before she had the opportunity to give birth.

So, and this was before the “partial birth abortion ban” was enacted (not when the story was told, but when it took place), the woman opted to get an intact dilation and extraction procedure (since that’s the proper medical term, “partial birth abortion” is a made up term and has no medical relevance). 

Do you know what that allowed her to do? What that allows a lot of uterus-bearers in the same predicament to do? 

She was able to hold her dead, intact fetus and mourn for it.

Now, she would have to get a procedure that literally rips the fetus apart, since apparently anti-choicers looking for a means to chip away at Roe v Wade think that this is a better alternative to the described procedure above. As the law currently stands, it is now impossible for people like the woman I described to have their fetuses aborted intact so that they can hold them like they wanted to. It is impossible for women like the one I described to have a body to mourn over. 

So good job. Because you’re too ignorant to actually know why uterus-bearers get late-term abortion, specifically intact D & X procedures, you’ve essentially made it much harder for those that are experiencing the difficult choice to end a wanted pregnancy to mourn and move on. 

But hey, go ahead and continue to consider yourself compassionate. I guess ignorance really is bliss, especially when you can hold up illustrations of medical procedures you don’t understand and hide behind them as if they have any meaning in the face of the reality that you refuse to acknowledge.

^^^ THIS. BLESS YOU.

17 Sep 2014 / Reblogged from paradises-angel with 85,701 notes

lancrebitch:

crunchierkatie:

i love seeing girls close ranks when their fella is cheating, instead of defending him and attacking the other girls. like seriously. it warms my cold, cold heart so much. 

i need the rest of this story, where did you put the body

(Source: twirpy)

15 Sep 2014 / Reblogged from infamymonster with 318,018 notes

(Source: poryqon)

cross-connect:

Alan Demafiles is a US based 3D animation generalist skilled in modelling, texturing, animation, lighting and rendering. He posts his work on Tumblr as demafleez.

#

26 Aug 2014 / Reblogged from cross-connect with 184 notes

tatsmato-anon:

dratraichuturnright:

thatsqualitystuff:

jonisspiffy:

THE SLASH BRINGING
SASH WRINGING
TRASH SINGING
MASH FLINGING
FLASH STRINGING RINGING
CRASH DINGING

THE HASH SLINGING SLASHER

i’m re-blogging this…
at night.

tatsmato-anon:

dratraichuturnright:

thatsqualitystuff:

jonisspiffy:

THE SLASH BRINGING

SASH WRINGING

TRASH SINGING

MASH FLINGING

FLASH STRINGING RINGING

CRASH DINGING

THE HASH SLINGING SLASHER

i’m re-blogging this…

at night.

image

(Source: josiephone)

26 Aug 2014 / Reblogged from ruinedchildhood with 494,603 notes

manaphy:

youll never guess what happened today

26 Aug 2014 / Reblogged from megustamemes with 43,540 notes

"where are my glasses?"

anyone who’s ever had glasses (via communistbakery)

26 Aug 2014 / Reblogged from ruinedchildhood with 126,673 notes

theevanstale:

evolutia:

swallowthatshit:

gang0fwolves:

wussut:

sizvideos:

4 Year Old Foils Babysitter’s Robbery Plot - Video

Let’s just blame the black guy…

believe a little girl in 30 seconds but won’t believe the black man after 5 hours….lol ok.

Says a lot.

It really does. I think it’s wonderful that she told that truth however, this is a prime example of white privilege. At 4 years old, she actually had systematic power over the fate of a Black male. White privilege is a very real and impactful thing.

Ain’t forgot about this.

21 Aug 2014 / Reblogged from theevanstale with 52,537 notes

jakesheadwarning:

Stars spoiling the movie version of old books during interviews.

21 Aug 2014 / Reblogged from infamymonster with 282,312 notes

calivibe:

w-for-wumbo:

theindieshit:

linzthenerd:

ineedthesandandthewaves:

This was the most realistic and saddest thing I’ve ever seen in a kids movie.

They didn’t use any words through this sequence, and you still knew exactly what was going on and it was a hundred times more powerful for that silence.

I’ve never cried as hard watching a Disney movie.

Fucking Pixar… ugh…

WATCHED THIS YESTERDAY AND CRIED SO MUCH

calivibe:

w-for-wumbo:

theindieshit:

linzthenerd:

ineedthesandandthewaves:

This was the most realistic and saddest thing I’ve ever seen in a kids movie.

They didn’t use any words through this sequence, and you still knew exactly what was going on and it was a hundred times more powerful for that silence.

I’ve never cried as hard watching a Disney movie.

Fucking Pixar… ugh…

WATCHED THIS YESTERDAY AND CRIED SO MUCH

21 Aug 2014 / Reblogged from maljoylove13 with 348,092 notes

youflabbergastedme:

orangeitnblack:

pretty sure it’s katy perry

or jared leto

21 Aug 2014 / Reblogged from infamymonster with 149,666 notes

epic-humor:

will do anything for foood

(Source: poyzn)

frenchinhalechanelxoxo:

yeahriggins:

Re-mothafuckin blog

Lmfaooo

(Source: kittiezandtittiez)

21 Aug 2014 / Reblogged from infamymonster with 305,557 notes

(Source: theonepersontheyneverexpected)

21 Aug 2014 / Reblogged from ellesigm with 34 notes

(Source: mercuryfish)

20 Aug 2014 / Reblogged from ruinedchildhood with 36,060 notes